Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 221
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Advertise | Login 
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 63-67

Identification of a surrogate anthropometric measurement to birth weight in high-risk low birth weight newborns in a developing country

1 Department of Paediatrics, Army College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Neonatology, Nice Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3 Department of Pediatrics, Ex-Army Hospital (Research and Referral), New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Bindu T Nair
Department of Paediatrics, Army College of Medical Sciences, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi- 110 010
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0331-3131.206212

Rights and Permissions

Background: The study of anthropometric measurements of newborns at birth allows rapid evaluation of the neonate who has suffered abnormal intrauterine growth. Thus, neonates at increased risk of postnatal complications can be followed-up and given greater care. Objective: The aim of our study was to identify a simple anthropometric measurement which can act as a surrogate to birth weight(BW) in a resource-poor country like India where the weight of majority of the newborns is not taken. Materials and Methods: We studied all consecutive singleton newborns with gestational age between 28weeks and 42weeks delivered at a large hospital in North India between January 2015 and December 2015. The total number of new-borns included in the study was 3000. All data were entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version15.0(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The mean BW of 3000 neonates was 2387g(standard deviation-560). The mean crown heel length, head circumference, chest circumference(CC), mid-upper arm circumference, mid-calf circumference, and mid-thigh circumference were 45.9±3.4cm, 32.6.5±2.3cm, 29.5±2.7cm, 10.1±1.3cm, 10.5±1.3, and 14.1±1.2cm, respectively. There was a positive correlation of BW to all such anthropometric measurements with the highest correlation coefficient for CC(r=0.73). The optimal cutoff points for CC and arm circumference to identify low BW(LBW) newborns were≥29.5cm and≥10.1cm, respectively. Conclusion: Measurement of CC is a simple, easy, cheap, and reliable method for identification of LBW. Hence, it can be easily made use of identifying high-risk newborns by our health-care workers in rural settings of developing countries like India.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded269    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal